<aside> 💡

The best technology may not always succeed in the market, the best products usually do

</aside>

Today, we've heard a lot about groundbreaking technology, which is integral to our industry. However, we often face challenges in translating these technological advancements into effective products. Here are some key insights from our experience:

Cosmos has rightfully earned recognition as a pioneer in blockchain innovation, particularly in fundamental infrastructure development. However, there's been a noticeable gap between their technological achievements and their ability to translate these innovations into widely-adopted user products and experiences.

Consider two notable examples:

  1. Proof of Stake and Liquid Staking: While these concepts originated within the Cosmos ecosystem, the largest implementation today is Lido, operating primarily on Ethereum.
  2. Inter-security and Restaking: Though Cosmos first developed these technologies, Eigen Layer has achieved the most successful commercialization.

This pattern highlights an important distinction between pioneering technology and achieving market dominance. Despite being first to market with several groundbreaking innovations, Cosmos has often seen others successfully commercialize and scale these concepts on different platforms.

The key takeaway? While the best technology doesn't always succeed in the market, the best products usually do. As builders, it's our responsibility to not only consider technological improvements but also to package these advancements into better products and experiences. This approach ensures users can fully benefit from these innovations.

<aside> 🤔

What makes a better product in finance?

</aside>

What Makes a Product "Better" in Blockchain and DeFi?

While decentralization, trustlessness, and self-custody are crucial in blockchain technology, they often relate more to system design than user experience. From a user's perspective, especially in DeFi, three key factors drive product value:

1. Capital Efficiency

2. Accessibility

3. Synergy

Throughout the industry, we've observed significant fragmentation and challenges across all three of these areas. While maintaining core blockchain principles is crucial, focusing on these user-centric metrics is essential for creating products that genuinely serve user needs and drive adoption.

<aside> 🤔

So the question becomes: how do we change this?

</aside>

How do we take all these amazing technologies package them into nice product that we can then distribute to the industry?

Here are three stories we want to share with you.


<aside> 💡

Our first story focuses on not settling for existing designs and product concepts.

</aside>

The Evolution of Trading and Market Making

Trading has been a fundamental part of human civilization, enabling specialization and driving societal growth. Over time, the quest for efficiency in trading has led to significant innovations:

The history of trading is deeply intertwined with the history of civilization. Trade enables specialization—where one person might produce food, another might create art, and they exchange these goods. This exchange fuels societal growth. Over time, the quest for efficiency in trading has led to significant innovations:

Era Innovation Impact
Early Civilization Physical exchanges Enabled specialization and goods exchange
Medieval Times Town markets Centralized exchanges, reduced travel for necessities
Industrial Era Trading floors Streamlined financial asset exchanges
Modern Era Electronic order books Aggregated preferences from thousands of participants

As trading moved on-chain, the initial application of traditional order book models faced challenges due to technological limitations. This led to the development of Automated Market Makers (AMMs).

AMMs: Revolutionizing Blockchain Trading

AMMs introduced a simple yet powerful innovation: a single liquidity pool as a counterparty for all trades. This dramatically improved computational efficiency and democratized market making. However, AMMs also have limitations:

The Solution: Integrated Infrastructure

To address these challenges, we propose integrated infrastructure using app chains. This combines several technologies to create more efficient markets:

  1. Advanced On-Chain Orderbooks
  2. Enhanced Infrastructure Components:

These components enable the creation of "supervaults" - sophisticated market-making tools that offer numerous benefits:

Benefit Description
Minimized adverse selection Reduces unfair advantages for sophisticated traders
Best execution for traders Ensures optimal pricing and trade execution
Enhanced LP protection Safeguards liquidity providers' interests
Reduced impermanent loss Minimizes or eliminates a common risk for LPs
Consistent earnings Generates steady income from facilitated trades

This integrated approach significantly reduces trading spreads while maintaining profitability for liquidity providers, representing a major advancement in decentralized market making.


Advanced Market Making: Efficiency and Democratization

Our system operates within a narrow ±2% band around the market price, dramatically improving capital efficiency across the ecosystem. Here's how the process works:

Cyclical Operation Process:

  1. Each block receives an oracle update with the current market price
  2. Market making occurs around this price point
  3. Capital is reserved and deployed to the orderbook
  4. Trades are executed
  5. Liquidity is withdrawn
  6. The cycle repeats

This cyclical process achieves two critical objectives:

1. Democratization of Market Making Profits:

2. Enhanced Capital Efficiency:

The Importance of Infrastructure

Financial markets are driven by the pursuit of efficiency and profitability. For decentralized products to succeed, they must outperform existing solutions in these aspects. This requires:

Integrated Infrastructure:

Specialized Options:

This approach represents a significant leap in decentralized finance, moving beyond simple automated systems to sophisticated, efficient market mechanisms that can truly compete with traditional financial infrastructure.